Flmodafinil
CRL-40 · 940 · bisfluoromodafinil · lauflumide · NLS-4 · 4 · 4-difluoromodafinil · flodafinil
Last updated
At a glance
Overview
Why Flmodafinil#
Flmodafinil (CRL-40,940, lauflumide, NLS-4) is the bisfluoro analog of modafinil, and it has carved out a specific niche in the nootropic community: the people who want modafinil's focus and wake-drive without the prescription friction, without the CYP3A4 induction that wrecks hormonal contraceptives and interacts with orals, and without the 15-hour tail that sabotages sleep. Preclinical work by Luca, Bandarabadi, Konofal et al. (2018) showed the compound doing more with less — significantly extended wakefulness at roughly half the modafinil dose, and critically, without compensatory sleep rebound.
The appeal for physique-focused users is practical. Cutting-phase dopaminergic support for diet adherence, clean CNS drive for fasted AM training days, and a tolerable focus window for work or study without the jittery ceiling of higher-dose modafinil or the cardiovascular load of amphetamine-class stimulants. Structurally it is a selective atypical dopamine reuptake inhibitor — tonic DAT blockade rather than the phasic dopamine spikes that make cocaine-like stimulants reinforcing, which is why subjective reports consistently describe the effect as "focused" rather than "wired."
"CRL-40,940 displayed atypical DAT blocker properties, promoting sustained extracellular dopamine without the sharp phasic spikes associated with classic psychostimulants like cocaine." — Keighron et al., ACS Chemical Neuroscience (2019)
The sections below cover documented flmodafinil dosing ranges, the modafinil potency comparison, standard stacking patterns (L-theanine, caffeine, adaptogens), side-effect management, and the common pitfalls — late-day dosing, daily-use drift, and sourcing quality — that separate a clean focus protocol from a tolerance spiral.
How Flmodafinil works
Atypical Dopamine Transporter Inhibition#
Flmodafinil is the bis(4-fluoro) ring-substituted analog of modafinil and acts primarily as a selective, atypical dopamine reuptake inhibitor at the dopamine transporter (DAT). The fluorine substitutions at the para positions of both phenyl rings increase DAT affinity relative to the unsubstituted modafinil scaffold while preserving the "atypical" binding geometry that separates this chemotype from cocaine-like stimulants.
"The bis-para-fluoro analogue (CRL-40,940) exhibited increased affinity at the dopamine transporter compared to the parent compound modafinil, while retaining an atypical inhibitor profile." — Cao J. et al., ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters, 2011
Practically, this is why subjects report flmodafinil as "cleaner" and more motivationally focused than the same mg of modafinil — the compound is sitting on DAT harder, but in a conformation that doesn't trigger the reinforcement/euphoria profile of classic psychostimulants.
Tonic Rather Than Phasic Dopamine Elevation#
The way flmodafinil elevates extracellular dopamine is as important as how much. Voltammetry and microdialysis work in the mouse nucleus accumbens shell shows that CRL-40,940 stabilizes DAT in an inward-occluded conformation, producing slow, sustained dopamine elevation rather than the sharp phasic surges that drive the abuse liability of cocaine, amphetamine, or methylphenidate.
"CRL-40,940 displayed atypical DAT blocker properties, promoting sustained extracellular dopamine without the sharp phasic spikes associated with classic psychostimulants like cocaine." — Keighron JD et al., ACS Chemical Neuroscience, 2019
The downstream result is attentional gain and motivational drive without the crash. This is the mechanistic underpinning of the cutting-phase use case: sustained PFC and striatal dopamine tone blunts appetite, rescues the anhedonia of a deep deficit, and makes diet adherence possible without the rebound binge that follows a stimulant peak-and-crash curve.
Downstream Wake-Promoting Circuitry#
Like the modafinil parent scaffold, flmodafinil's dopaminergic signal propagates into the classical arousal circuitry: indirect activation of histaminergic tuberomammillary neurons, elevation of hypothalamic orexin/hypocretin tone, and modest increases in cortical norepinephrine and glutamate. The net output is prolonged wakefulness with preserved cognitive performance — and the preclinical potency data suggest flmodafinil is meaningfully more efficient at this than its parent.
"NLS-4 significantly increased total wake time and decreased non-REM sleep in rats with roughly half the dose required for modafinil, and notably did not produce compensatory sleep rebound." — Luca G. et al., Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2018
The absence of compensatory sleep rebound is the practical distinction from caffeine and from classic stimulants: the "sleep debt" model doesn't quite apply. Subjects report same-night sleep is achievable if the dose window closes by late morning, consistent with the ~10–15h extrapolated half-life.
Clean Hepatic Profile (No CYP Induction)#
A mechanistically underappreciated advantage: flmodafinil does not appear to meaningfully induce CYP3A4 or inhibit CYP2C19 the way modafinil does. Modafinil's enzyme-induction profile is the reason it tanks hormonal contraceptive efficacy and interacts with a long list of orals (including several AAS-relevant 17-alpha-alkylated compounds that depend on hepatic clearance kinetics). The fluorinated analog metabolizes along a different route and does not appear to drive the same induction cascade — a non-trivial upgrade for anyone stacking a eugeroic with orals on cycle. The data here is thin enough that it should be treated as a working assumption rather than a settled fact, but it tracks with what community users running both compounds consistently report.
Parent Compound, Not a Prodrug#
Unlike adrafinil (which is metabolized to modafinil in the liver), flmodafinil is delivered and active as the parent molecule. Analytical work by Dowling et al. confirmed the structural identity and also flagged that CRL-40,940 can thermally degrade in GC injectors to a tetraphenylethane byproduct — relevant for sourcing quality control but not for pharmacology.
"Thermal degradation of CRL-40,940 in analytical conditions highlights challenges in confirming sample identity, emphasizing the need for robust analytic testing for research chemical sourcing." — Dowling G. et al., Drug Testing and Analysis, 2017
The practical takeaway: onset is faster than adrafinil (no hepatic conversion step) and cleaner than modafinil (no enzyme-induction tail), which is why the non-medical nootropic community has gravitated to it as the more refined member of the family.
"CRL-40,940 (flmodafinil) is attracting interest among non-medical users for enhanced cognitive performance, though its safety profile in humans remains inadequately characterized." — Schifano F. et al., Drugs, 2022
Protocol
| Level | Dose | Frequency | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Low | 25–50 mg | As needed | Documented entry-level range |
| Mid | 50–100 mg | As needed | Most commonly studied range |
| High | 100–200 mg | As needed | Community practice treats this as acute/as-needed (1–3 days per week), not chronic daily. Dose window should close by ~10 AM to preserve sleep architecture. A split protocol of 50mg AM + 50mg early afternoon is documented for extended focus windows. |
Cycle length & outcomes
Documented cycle
1–3 weeks
Plateau after
3 wks
Cycle Structure#
Flmodafinil is not cycled in the endocrine sense — there is no HPG-axis suppression, no receptor downregulation that requires a washout, and no PCT. What the community does manage is dopaminergic tolerance, which builds quickly with consecutive-day dosing and manifests as a flat, anhedonic "day-after" that's indistinguishable from the phenomenon well-documented on chronic modafinil.
The practical implication: treat flmodafinil as an acute/as-needed tool, not a daily stack staple. Most experienced users settle into 1–3 dosing days per week and find the compound stays sharp indefinitely on that schedule. Daily dosing past ~2–3 weeks reliably produces subjective tolerance and the characteristic rebound flatness.
Protocol Table by Goal#
| Goal | Cycle Length | Dose | Frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| Focus / deep-work days | Open-ended, as-needed | 50–100mg AM | 1–3 days/week |
| Shift work / jetlag | 1–7 days acute | 100mg at shift start (+ optional 50mg re-dose 5–6h in) | Daily during shift block only |
| Cutting-phase diet adherence | 2–3 weeks | 50–75mg AM | 2–3 days/week |
| Post-cycle motivation slump | 2–3 weeks | 50mg AM | 1–2 days/week |
| Exam / high-stakes cognitive load | Acute, ≤5 consecutive days | 75–100mg AM | Daily during event only |
Above ~150mg the sympathetic edge climbs sharply — anxiety, jitter, elevated HR — without proportional gains in focus. The dose-response curve is a plateau, not a line.
Onset and Duration#
Subjective onset runs 1.5–3 hours after oral dosing, noticeably sharper than modafinil's 2–4 h ramp. Effective focus window is 8–12 hours, with a shorter tail than modafinil — users consistently report better same-night sleep at comparable subjective intensity.
"NLS-4 significantly increased total wake time and decreased non-REM sleep in rats with roughly half the dose required for modafinil, and notably did not produce compensatory sleep rebound." — Luca et al., Frontiers in Neuroscience (2018)
The community potency rule: roughly 2× per milligram vs. modafinil on subjective wakefulness, consistent with the preclinical data above. A 50mg flmodafinil dose tracks closely with a 100mg modafinil dose in most first-person reports.
Tapering and Loading#
Neither is required. There is no loading phase — the first dose is the dose, and effect is acute. There is no taper on cessation because there is no receptor downregulation that needs unwinding; the "flat day after" from chronic daily use resolves in 48–72 hours of abstinence. The fix for tolerance is spacing, not escalation.
Dosing Window (Non-Negotiable)#
All dosing should close by ~10 AM. The compound's 10+ hour functional duration means afternoon dosing reliably wrecks sleep architecture, and the split 50mg AM + 50mg early-afternoon protocol is the latest reasonable schedule. A 50mg dose at 2 PM will still be meaningfully present at midnight.
Bloodwork Cadence#
No compound-specific labs are indicated. Flmodafinil doesn't touch lipids, liver enzymes, or the HPG axis. What should be monitored, particularly by users stacking it on cycle:
- Resting BP and HR — a $20 cuff, checked weekly during any multi-week use period. The adrenergic component is modest at standard doses but real, and it stacks additively with harsh orals, trenbolone, and high-dose caffeine.
- Standard on-cycle panel (CBC, CMP, lipids) if running alongside AAS — the flmodafinil itself won't move these, but it's a reasonable add to the existing cadence.
Users with pre-existing hypertension, LVH, arrhythmia, or untreated cardiovascular disease should not run this compound on top of a strained cardiovascular system — the combination with AAS-induced BP elevation is the realistic risk, not flmodafinil in isolation.
Stacking Notes for Cycle Planning#
The CYP3A4 induction absence is the key advantage over modafinil for anyone running orals. Modafinil induces CYP3A4 and inhibits CYP2C19, which degrades hormonal contraceptive efficacy and meaningfully alters the PK of several AAS-relevant orals. Flmodafinil reportedly lacks this induction profile, making it cleaner to layer onto an existing protocol — though female subjects on hormonal contraceptives should still keep barrier backup given how thin the human PK data remains.
"CRL-40,940 (flmodafinil) is attracting interest among non-medical users for enhanced cognitive performance, though its safety profile in humans remains inadequately characterized." — Schifano et al., Drugs (2022)
That caveat is the honest frame: the mechanism is well-characterized, the preclinical wake data is strong, and community experience is broad and consistent — but formal human PK/safety data is not public. Dose conservatively, space dosing days, and treat resting BP as the real-world endpoint worth watching.
Risks & mistakes
Common (most users)#
- Headache — the most frequently reported effect, dose-dependent and typically emerging 3–5 hours post-dose. Responds well to aggressive hydration (aim for ~500ml water with the dose and another 500ml through the morning) and modest sodium. A pinch of salt in the morning water or a low-sugar electrolyte drink handles most cases. If headaches persist at 100mg, dropping to 50mg usually resolves them.
- Mild anxiety or sympathetic edge — that "wired" quality characteristic of dopaminergic wake-promoters. 200mg L-theanine taken alongside the dose is the near-universal community fix and takes the edge off without blunting focus. Avoid stacking with a second strong stimulant (high-dose caffeine, ephedrine) until the response to flmodafinil alone is mapped.
- Appetite suppression — useful during cutting phases, inconvenient on a bulk. Protein shakes and calorie-dense liquids are the workaround when food doesn't appeal. Not a thermogenic; the suppression is the fat-loss-adjacent effect.
- Insomnia — dosing after noon reliably wrecks sleep. The protocol calls for closing the dose window by ~10 AM; the split protocol (50mg AM + 50mg early afternoon) should cap at roughly 1 PM. 300mg magnesium glycinate in the evening offsets residual sympathetic carryover.
- Dry mouth, mild nausea — primarily at initiation. Dosing with a light breakfast rather than fully fasted smooths both.
- Irritability or emotional compression — the dopaminergic tone flattens affective range in some subjects. Usually benign and reverses within 24 hours of the last dose; if it persists, weekly frequency is too high.
Uncommon (dose-dependent or individual)#
- Elevated resting heart rate and blood pressure — modest at 50–100mg but climbs noticeably above 150mg. Users running flmodafinil alongside harsh orals, trenbolone, or an AAS cycle with untreated hypertension should monitor resting BP and HR. If resting BP trends above 140/90 or HR above 95, the dose is too high or the stack is too loaded.
- Jitter, tremor, tachycardia — above ~150mg this becomes common rather than rare. Drop to 100mg and layer L-theanine.
- Post-dose "flat day" — anhedonia and low motivation the day after a dosing day, characteristic of dopaminergic tolerance. Mitigation is frequency control: 1–3 days per week, not daily. If flat days appear at 2×/week, spread to 1×/week for a month.
- Tolerance drift — daily use past ~2–3 weeks produces the same dull, subthreshold response well-documented for chronic modafinil. Addressed by cycling off for 1–2 weeks rather than escalating the dose.
"NLS-4 significantly increased total wake time and decreased non-REM sleep in rats with roughly half the dose required for modafinil, and notably did not produce compensatory sleep rebound." — Luca et al., Frontiers in Neuroscience (2018)
The absence of rebound in preclinical work is reassuring, but it does not override the human reality that closing the dose window early preserves sleep architecture.
Rare but serious#
- Severe dermatologic reaction (Stevens-Johnson syndrome, TEN) — no published flmodafinil-specific cases exist, but modafinil carries a black-box warning for SJS/TEN and flmodafinil is a close structural analog. Any new rash, mucosal involvement, or flu-like prodrome warrants immediate discontinuation and medical evaluation. Do not restart.
- Precipitated psychosis or mania — dopaminergic agents can trigger episodes in susceptible individuals. Warning signs: pressured speech, grandiosity, paranoid ideation, sleep going from 5 hours to zero. Discontinue immediately.
- Cardiac event (arrhythmia, hypertensive crisis) — the risk is concentrated in subjects with pre-existing cardiovascular disease, LVH, or those stacking with MAOIs or high-dose sympathomimetics. Chest pain, palpitations beyond mild awareness, or syncope means stop and evaluate.
- Sample identity failures — not a pharmacologic risk per se, but the Dowling 2017 work documented that CRL-40,940 thermally degrades in GC injectors to a tetraphenylethane byproduct, complicating analytical confirmation. Bad sourcing can mean the capsule is not what the label claims.
"Thermal degradation of CRL-40,940 in analytical conditions highlights challenges in confirming sample identity, emphasizing the need for robust analytic testing for research chemical sourcing." — Dowling et al., Drug Testing and Analysis (2017)
Third-party HPLC testing (Janoshik, Energy Control) is the standard community safeguard.
Hard contraindications#
- Pre-existing cardiovascular disease, uncontrolled hypertension, LVH, or arrhythmia. A dopaminergic/adrenergic wake-promoter layered on a strained heart — particularly on cycle — is not a margin worth testing.
- MAOIs (phenelzine, tranylcypromine, selegiline at MAO-A doses). Mechanistically foreseeable hypertensive crisis. No dose is safe.
- History of psychosis, schizophrenia, or bipolar I. Dopaminergic agents precipitate episodes.
- Pregnancy. Modafinil is pregnancy category D with a documented congenital malformation signal; the analog is treated identically in the absence of clearing data. This line does not move.
- Afternoon dosing. Not a safety contraindication in the cardiac sense, but an absolute protocol rule — anything past ~noon compromises sleep, and chronic sleep compression is where the cognitive and cardiovascular edges of this compound turn ugly.
- Concurrent strong sympathomimetic stacks (high-dose amphetamines, ephedrine + caffeine + yohimbine combinations). Additive cardiovascular load without additive cognitive benefit.
Gender and PCT considerations#
Flmodafinil is non-hormonal. No androgen receptor, estrogen receptor, or HPG-axis activity has been documented. No effect on testosterone, LH, FSH, or prolactin is reported. No PCT is required, and no ancillaries are needed.
Female subjects should note that the parent modafinil scaffold reduces hormonal contraceptive efficacy via CYP3A4 induction. Flmodafinil reportedly lacks this induction, which is one of its real advantages over modafinil — but the human data is thin, and barrier backup during flmodafinil weeks remains the conservative call for subjects relying on oral contraceptives.
Dosing is not gender-specific. The 25–200mg ladder applies uniformly; smaller-frame subjects simply start at the low end (25–50mg) and titrate.
Stack & combine
Multipliers applied when these compounds run together. Values > 1 indicate a bonus on that axis. Tap a partner to expand the mechanism.
| Partner | Type | Lean | Fat loss | Recovery |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| synergistic | ×1.00 | ×1.08 | ×1.15 |
FAQ — Flmodafinil
Where to buy

NextChems
Affiliate link — we may earn a commission at no cost to you.
- Flmodafinil (CRL-40,940) | Buy Flmodafinil 50 mg onlineBuy Flmodafinil
Research & citations
5 studies cited on this page.
Conclusion
Flmodafinil positions itself as the nootropic community's preferred modafinil analog for acute, high-function focus with reduced CYP interaction risk and a cleaner side effect profile.
Key takeaways:
- Standard oral dose: 50–100 mg, AM-only for optimal wakefulness and minimal sleep disruption
- Cycle structure: acute/as-needed (1–3 days/week, up to 3 weeks); chronic daily use leads to predictable tolerance
- Half-life: ~10–15 hours extrapolated; practical duration is 8–12 hours per dose
- Stack: 200 mg L-theanine is the near-universal companion; caffeine (100–200 mg) can be layered for intensity, but watch for sympathetic load
- Standout niche: enhanced dopaminergic focus without modafinil's prescription friction or strong CYP3A4 induction
- Safety: avoid in cardiovascular disease, MAOI use, or psychiatric risk states; dose window should close by 10 AM to preserve sleep quality
For research protocols demanding robust wakefulness, motivation, or diet adherence, flmodafinil remains a practical, community-validated eugeroic with a favorable edge-to-benefit ratio compared to older stimulants.
"The bis-para-fluoro analogue (CRL-40,940) exhibited increased affinity at the dopamine transporter compared to the parent compound modafinil, while retaining an atypical inhibitor profile." — Cao et al., ACS Medicinal Chemistry Letters (2011).
"NLS-4 significantly increased total wake time and decreased non-REM sleep in rats with roughly half the dose required for modafinil, and notably did not produce compensatory sleep rebound." — Luca et al., Frontiers in Neuroscience (2018).