About
The reference we wished existed.
Biomogging is an independent editorial site covering peptide protocols, SARMs cycles, GLP-1s, and looksmaxxing stacks. No vendor bias, no email wall, no bro-science. Just structured reference content for adults doing their own research.
Who runs this
Written and maintained by a small editorial team.
The Biomogging Team
Editorial team
Biomogging is run by a small editorial team with backgrounds in bodybuilding, biohacking, and biology. We're not licensed clinicians, and we don't pretend to be. We're informed adults documenting what we wish had been organised when we started researching this stuff, and citing the underlying literature so you can verify it for yourself.
We publish under a collective byline rather than individual names. Editorial credibility on this site comes from sourcing and methodology, not from a single person's reputation.
We're not a clinic, a pharmacy, or a vendor. We're a reference site. If you're looking for medical advice, see a clinician. If you're looking for organised, honest information about compounds you've already decided to research, that's what we're here for.
Methodology
How we research compound profiles.
Sourced, not anecdotal
Every compound profile cites the primary literature where one exists. Where the evidence is thin, conflicting, or rodent-only, we say so explicitly. We don't cite Reddit comments as sources.
Outcome-first structure
Stacks and protocols are organised around a specific aesthetic or performance outcome, with compound choices justified rather than just listed. Mechanism, half-life, dose range, and risk grading on every entry.
Editorial independence from vendors
We don't sell compounds, supplements, coaching, or sponsored compound write-ups. The science on each compound is the same regardless of which vendor offers an affiliate program. Outbound vendor links are affiliate links, clearly disclosed at the top of every page that contains them.
Editorial standards
What we will, and won't, publish.
- Citations where they exist. Compound profiles link to primary literature, regulatory filings, and manufacturer documents where available. Where evidence is thin or conflicting, we say so.
- No invented dosing. Dose ranges come from published clinical trials, regulatory filings, or well-documented community protocols, not from “what worked for my buddy”.
- Risk first, results second. Side effect profiles, contraindications, and bloodwork guidance appear before the upside on every compound page.
- Affiliate links, openly disclosed. Outbound vendor links on compound and stack pages are affiliate links and are marked as such, with a visible disclosure at the top of every page that contains them. Affiliate revenue does not determine whether a compound is covered or what the science section says about it. It does mean we link to vendors who offer affiliate programs. See our disclaimer for the full policy.
- Updated when the science moves. Pages carry a “last updated” timestamp. When a study is retracted, a regulator changes its stance, or a meaningful new trial publishes, we update the affected pages.